• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • Advertising
  • Join PGM
Pepperdine Graphic

Pepperdine Graphic

  • COVID-19
  • News
  • Sports
  • Life & Arts
  • Perspectives
  • GNews
    • Staff Spotlights
    • First and Foremost
    • Allgood Food
    • Pepp in Your Step
    • DunnCensored
    • Beyond the Statistics
  • Special Publications
    • Peace Through Music
    • Climate Change
    • Everybody Has One
    • If It Bleeds
    • By the Numbers
    • LGBTQ+ Edition: We Are All Human
    • Where We Stand: One Year Later
    • In the Midst of Tragedy
  • Currents
    • Currents Fall 2022
    • Spring 2022: Moments
    • Fall 2021: Global Citizenship
    • Spring 2021: Beauty From Ashes
    • Fall 2020: Humans of Pepperdine
    • Spring 2020: Everyday Feminism
    • Fall 2019: Challenging Perceptions of Light & Dark
  • Podcasts
    • RE: Connect
    • Small Studio Sessions
    • SportsWaves
    • The Graph
    • The Melanated Muckraker
  • Print Editions
  • NewsWaves
  • Sponsored Content

When Free Is Not Free

October 31, 2016 by Anna Brown

Image by Nate Barton

Labeling something as “free” does not make it free — someone always must pay the cost. After carefully considering the Election and presidential candidate Hillary Clinton’s proposal for free college, its flaws become quite evident, as supported by Bob Luebke’s article “Why Free College Tuition Is a Bad Idea,” published Feb. 4 by Civitas Institute.

The election is fast approaching, and with this privilege comes the responsibility to select the candidate who will best improve our nation and confront the critical struggles we face. A myriad of debatable topics have been covered by our candidates, yet there is one that continuously stands with prominence, and most certainly pertains to many my age.

This election, Hillary Clinton advocated the implementation of free college, as expressed on her official campaign website. This proposal has been under constant scrutiny, and it further connects to her plan to increase taxation.

Bringing up this proposal once again in the latest presidential debate on Sept. 26, Clinton offered no indication of cutting other sources of spending in order to follow through with this promise. One may interpret this to mean raising taxes, something she has already assured will happen for many reasons in her call for “A Fair Tax System,” accessible on her website, if she is elected. Republican nominee Donald Trump, on the other hand, re-emphasized his proposal expressed on his official campaign site to cut taxes across the board, from individuals to corporations.

The United States is more than $19 trillion in debt, according to an analysis by Romina Boccia titled “The U.S. Debt Just Exceeded $19 Trillion. Here’s How We Got Here” published Feb. 2 by The Daily Signal. With more government programs funded through taxation, this number will only continue to rise. While Clinton’s proposal for free college sounds ideal and potentially beneficial, it is not economically prudent when looking at the continuously increasing debts we face. Trump’s proposition to lower taxes, on the contrary, would allow individuals more money to pay for the college of their choice.

A mentality of entitlement in the stereotypical Millennial parallels to this proposal for free college — an idea highly supported by some Generation Y. Ariel-Edwards-Levy affirms this in her statistical poll, “Millennials Are Pretty Terrible, According To A Poll of Millennials,” published Sept. 3, 2015 by The Huffington Post.

According to her poll, many Millennials themselves even agree with the titles with which they have been labeled — dependent individuals who are not goal-oriented enough and do not look ahead realistically. This is clearly reflected in much of Generation Y’s support of free college and other programs, with the failure to recognize the consequential outcomes regarding taxation and our nation’s extreme debt. Increased handouts are not promoting an improved work ethic, but only encouraging the already prominent sense of dependence embedded within my generation starting at childhood.

Certainly, other individuals who take their responsibilities and passions seriously would find this commonality extremely frustrating. After working diligently on something or putting extensive effort toward a particular cause, it is simply not satisfying to have others take the same amount of credit, or, speaking more politically, taking their “fair share” of wealth, without earning it. Charity and helping those incapable of helping themselves are respectable causes, yet unmerited entitlement should not be supported.

As Election Day approaches, my fellow Millennials and I must consider not just the surface rewards that may be presented, but the long-term consequences and potential improvements. We must challenge ourselves to research the perspectives of each candidate and the implications of their plans, and to select a candidate who will improve our country, but who will also encourage us to become self-reliant, a quality which has gone adrift amidst misleading perceptions of privilege.

______________

Follow Anna Brown on Twitter: @annakatbrown

Filed Under: Perspectives, The Informer Tagged With: Anna Brown, College, debate, election, Election 2016, free college, Graphic, millenial generation, millennials, perspectives, voting

Primary Sidebar

Categories

  • Featured
  • News
  • Life & Arts
  • Perspectives
  • Sports
  • Podcasts
  • G News
  • COVID-19
  • Fall 2021: Global Citizenship
  • Everybody Has One
  • Newsletters

Footer

Pepperdine Graphic Media
Copyright © 2023 ยท Pepperdine Graphic

Contact Us

Advertising
(310) 506-4318
peppgraphicadvertising@gmail.com

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
(310) 506-4311
peppgraphicmedia@gmail.com
Student Publications
Pepperdine University
24255 Pacific Coast Hwy
Malibu, CA 90263
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • YouTube