• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • Advertising
  • Join PGM
Pepperdine Graphic

Pepperdine Graphic

  • News
    • Good News
  • Sports
    • Hot Shots
  • Life & Arts
  • Perspectives
    • Advice Column
    • Waves Comic
  • GNews
    • Staff Spotlights
    • First and Foremost
    • Allgood Food
    • Pepp in Your Step
    • DunnCensored
    • Beyond the Statistics
  • Special Publications
    • 5 Years In
    • L.A. County Fires
    • Change in Sports
    • Solutions Journalism: Climate Anxiety
    • Common Threads
    • Art Edition
    • Peace Through Music
    • Climate Change
    • Everybody Has One
    • If It Bleeds
    • By the Numbers
    • LGBTQ+ Edition: We Are All Human
    • Where We Stand: One Year Later
    • In the Midst of Tragedy
  • Currents
    • Currents Spring 2025
    • Currents Fall 2024
    • Currents Spring 2024
    • Currents Winter 2024
    • Currents Spring 2023
    • Currents Fall 2022
    • Spring 2022: Moments
    • Fall 2021: Global Citizenship
    • Spring 2021: Beauty From Ashes
    • Fall 2020: Humans of Pepperdine
    • Spring 2020: Everyday Feminism
    • Fall 2019: Challenging Perceptions of Light & Dark
  • Podcasts
    • On the Other Hand
    • RE: Connect
    • Small Studio Sessions
    • SportsWaves
    • The Graph
    • The Melanated Muckraker
  • Print Editions
  • NewsWaves
  • Sponsored Content
  • Digital Deliveries
  • DPS Crime Logs

Controversial reading beneficial, not harmful

March 30, 2006 by Pepperdine Graphic

CASSANDRA TICER
Perspectives Assistant

In the recent weeks, parents from Malibu High School have been involved in a debate about the popular novel, “The Lovely Bones.” Their teens have been reading this novel in a school-wide reading project for grades 9 through 12. Several parents believe that it is not something that they want their children reading because the novel involves issues such as rape and murder.

Their disagreement, however, seems unwarranted because, according to the Malibu Times, the students voted to read this book .

This novel is written by Alice Sebold and was published in 2002. In it she used her personal experience of being raped as a young woman as an inspiration. Some parents within the high school fear that the discussions that will arise are for adult audiences, not for high school students. However, I feel that these are the exact discussions that students in high school should be having. The fact is that issues such as rape, tragedy and grief are issues that touch all of society, not just adults. High school students need to be able to grapple with difficult subjects to understand the world that they will be enter. And although rape and murder occurs in the novel, they are described in a very matter-of-fact manner in the beginning of the novel. The story is not just about negative issues. Instead, it is a beautiful novel about hope and how a family’s love can help them face their grief and eventually heal from the tragedy. 

It is every parent’s right to censor what their children are reading, watching and listening to. I fully agree with the saying, “see no evil, speak no evil, hear no evil.” Parents nowadays need to become more involved in their children’s lives and more active with their kid’s education. It is encouraging that the parents of Malibu High School are concerned enough with their children’s lives to censor what literature that they read.

Yet, I present a challenge to the concerned parents. Their argument is only valid if three stipulations hold true. First, the parents need to actually read the book for themselves and decide based upon their own family’s morals and beliefs whether is appropriate novel for their children. They shouldn’t decide something like this strictly because another parent complained to the school and described it as inappropriate literature.

Secondly, if the parents are going to censor what literature their children read, they also, in turn, must censor what their children watch on television and in movies. Often times movies and television shows not only have those issues represented on a much larger scale, but they also show more inappropriate scenes than the one described in the novel.

Last of all, parents must accordingly censor what their children listen to. The majority of popular songs seem to have themes and descriptions far more inappropriate than Sebold’s novel. These other sources of media throw very adult issues in the faces of young audiences and rarely give the option and availability of discussions.

I do not like the idea of censorship of literature. Many great pieces of literature that have provoked thought, reflection and change within a society have been censored or banned somewhere. According to the American Library Association, classics such as “Of Mice and Men,” “Brave New World,” “Adventures of Huckleberry Finn” have all been banned at some point in history. Other classics such as Shakespeare’s “Twelfth Night” were placed on the list, as recently as 1995, because it goes against the norms in alternative lifestyles.

Literature is too insightful and too important of a tool of change for society to censor and ban.

Instead of banning literature that invokes discussion, society should embrace these pieces of literature as opportunities to explore difficult issues that surround us and help lead us towards a greater understanding of mankind.

03-30-2006

Filed Under: Perspectives

Primary Sidebar

Categories

  • Featured
  • News
  • Life & Arts
  • Perspectives
  • Sports
  • Podcasts
  • G News
  • COVID-19
  • Fall 2021: Global Citizenship
  • Everybody Has One
  • Newsletters

Footer

Pepperdine Graphic Media
Copyright © 2025 · Pepperdine Graphic

Contact Us

Advertising
(310) 506-4318
peppgraphicadvertising@gmail.com

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
(310) 506-4311
peppgraphicmedia@gmail.com
Student Publications
Pepperdine University
24255 Pacific Coast Hwy
Malibu, CA 90263
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • YouTube