• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • Advertising
  • Join PGM
Pepperdine Graphic

Pepperdine Graphic

  • News
    • Good News
  • Sports
    • Hot Shots
  • Life & Arts
  • Perspectives
    • Advice Column
    • Waves Comic
  • GNews
    • Staff Spotlights
    • First and Foremost
    • Allgood Food
    • Pepp in Your Step
    • DunnCensored
    • Beyond the Statistics
  • Special Publications
    • 5 Years In
    • L.A. County Fires
    • Change in Sports
    • Solutions Journalism: Climate Anxiety
    • Common Threads
    • Art Edition
    • Peace Through Music
    • Climate Change
    • Everybody Has One
    • If It Bleeds
    • By the Numbers
    • LGBTQ+ Edition: We Are All Human
    • Where We Stand: One Year Later
    • In the Midst of Tragedy
  • Currents
    • Currents Spring 2025
    • Currents Fall 2024
    • Currents Spring 2024
    • Currents Winter 2024
    • Currents Spring 2023
    • Currents Fall 2022
    • Spring 2022: Moments
    • Fall 2021: Global Citizenship
    • Spring 2021: Beauty From Ashes
    • Fall 2020: Humans of Pepperdine
    • Spring 2020: Everyday Feminism
    • Fall 2019: Challenging Perceptions of Light & Dark
  • Podcasts
    • On the Other Hand
    • RE: Connect
    • Small Studio Sessions
    • SportsWaves
    • The Graph
    • The Melanated Muckraker
  • Print Editions
  • NewsWaves
  • Sponsored Content
  • Our Girls

GRE retracts set changes, original dates still standing

April 5, 2007 by Pepperdine Graphic

RYAN HAGEN
News Assistant

The largest revision in the history of the Graduate Record Exam (GRE) has been cancelled because the new format limited the number of times the test could be offered and therefore the number of students who could take it, according to the institution that runs the test. Also, previously-canceled dates in August and September will be reinstated.

Among other changes to the GRE, the test would have been offered only 35 times a year, with completely different questions each time.

The current computer-based test selects questions based on answers to previous questions and is offered nearly every day, leading some students to post questions online. But the proposed changes could have meant an overflow of students on the remaining test days, leading to a shortage of computers to take the test.

“We’ve been developing contingency plans since last fall, but they all would have led to other problems,” said Dawn Piacentino, associate director in the GRE program for Educational Testing Services.

ETS began working in 2005 to revise the test, required for admission to most grad schools. It would have nearly doubled in length and changed the type of questions. For instance, there would be more data analysis and reading interpretations.

The sudden reversal has many supporters.

“It certainly caught people by surprise,” said Russel Schaffer, senior communications manager for Kaplan Test Prep and Admissions. “[But] it’s better that ETS realized the issue now than after [it began giving tests].”

Associate Professor of Psychology Steven Rouse, who teaches a class that studies tests, agreed.

 “I frankly think it was a very good idea,” he wrote in an e-mail. “The current test is far from perfect, but at least we know what its strengths and weaknesses are; we know very little about the statistical strengths and weaknesses of the new one.”

04-05-2007

Filed Under: News

Primary Sidebar